And I'm not gonna go into color management and printing. And anybody should be able to guess the nightmare of having to go back and adjust the 1st tool having already used 5. Ah, and then was the absolutely brilliant design that each tool functions like an individual mask yet they're applied strictly sequentially, so if curves are the 1st tool I used yet something else like structure nudged the contrast in the wrong direction, if I go back to compensate with curves, I'm left with the preview interface without structure touched! I have to guess the combined effect of the curves adjustment and structure, looking at a preview with just curves! And this adds up. Then was the issue that although preview generation was speedier on Snapseed, they thought it OK to degrade quality and skip some of the processing, so that "preview" is in fact not even a real preview! Both the sharpness and DR can be off by a large margin with many of the tools. First there came a Camera RAW-wannabe interface, everything lossless had to be done on it although it had even fewer functions than Camera RAW whereas all the complex adjustments had to be done to a converted JPG, so whatever other adjustments you need, you'd have to guess their effects on the final output and preadjust to compensate in the lossless interface accordingly. The app was far more responsive than LR on my then GS6E, likely because LR's engine was always badly optimized, yet the devs of that app didn't have a clue how a DNG workflow is supposed to be. I happened to have used Snapseed, in an attempt to substitute a then less-than-mature LR Android, for around 2 years. moreUsing Snapseed to substitute PS.you absolutely have no idea what you're talking about do you. PhoneFreak45, And let me guess, you can't imagine finding replacements for those pieces of software? Lu. You can fool nobody but yourself saying otherwise. It can do word processing, that's generally accepted, and not a lot beyond that, especially not professional grade production. Now you come up with "I think it's ridiculous that people don't want their phones to do more."ĭoes it matter what one "wants"? It's clear to anybody with so much as a slight sense what a professional app is that Android phones can't "do more".
All those apps have a desktop mode on android." You reply with "So a robust word processor, video editor, photo editor, and web browser qualifies as severely devoid? Ridiculous."Īnd your examples that make the Android ecosystem so "abundant"?"LumaFusion video editor, Microsoft word, most chromium based browsers, YouTube, Gmail. moreAre you a bot? Do you hear yourself? I said "The point is that Android is severely devoid of professional apps and that stands true in many domains, not to mention AAA games." Clearly those are not professional apps - you'd think that's obvious.
0 kommentar(er)
